Unusual presentation of biliopancreatic cancer as primary retroperitoneal tumor.

Primary retroperitoneal tumors are little-known neoplasias and consequently, difficult to diagnose. We report an extremely unusual case of a biliopancreatic adenocarcinoma with retroperitoneal localization simulating a primary retroperitoneal tumor. As far as we know, there are no similar cases published up to date.

A rare gastrointestinal tumor: primary gastric melanoma.

Primary gastric melanoma is an exceptional tumour with less than 20 cases described in the literature, as its origin is not entirely clear as the presence of melanocytes in the stomach has not been demonstrated. Symptomatology is non-specific, which prevents its early detection, and it is diagnosed in late stages. We present the case of a patient who was admitted to our hospital for vomiting in coffee grounds with analytical and haemodynamic repercussions. Urgent gastroscopy revealed a gastric lesion suspicious for malignancy, which was histologically confirmed as gastric melanoma. The therapeutic approach to these tumours is complex and they have a very poor prognosis.

Biliary stent migration as a rare cause of ileal perforation.

The incidence rate of biliary stent migration is 3-6 %; most cases are asymptomatic, with elimination of the piece in the feces.

A rare cause of lower gastrointestinal bleeding: acquired hemophilia A.

We present the case of a 71-year-old male with a medical history of hypertension, dyslipidemia, and acute myocardial infarction in 2007 who was taking low-dose aspirin and bemiparin 3500 IU every 24 hours. He was admitted to the Urology Service with recurrent hematuria 14 days after radical prostatectomy, which ceased after continuous bladder irrigation.

Comparison of the Mayo Endoscopy Score and the Ulcerative Colitis Endoscopy Index of Severity and the Ulcerative Colitis Colonoscopy Index of Severity.

Background and study aims: Endoscopy plays an essential role in managing patients with ulcerative colitis (UC), as it allows us to visualize and assess the severity of the disease. As such assessments are not always objective, different scores have been devised to standardize the findings. The main aim of this study was to assess the interobserver variability between the Mayo Endoscopy Score (MES), Ulcerative Colitis Endoscopy Index of Severity (UCEIS) and Ulcerative Colitis Colonoscopy Index of Severity (UCCIS) analyzing the severity of the endoscopic lesions in patients with ulcerative colitis. Patients and methods: This was a single-cohort observational study in which a colonoscopy was carried out on patients with UC, as normal clinical practice, and a video was recorded. The results from the video were classified according to the MES, UCEIS and UCCIS by three endoscopic specialists independently, and they were compared to each other. The Mayo Endoscopy Score (MES) was used to assess the clinical situation of the patient. The therapeutic impact was analyzed after colonoscopy was carried out. Results: Sixty-seven patients were included in the study. The average age was 51 (SD ±â€Š16.7) and the average MES was 3.07 (SD ±â€Š2.54). The weighted Kappa index between endoscopists A and B for the MES was 0.8; between A and C 0.52; and between B and C 0.49. The intraclass correlation coefficient for UCEIS was 0.92 among the three endoscopists (CI 95 %: 0.83-0.96) and 0.96 for UCCIS among the three endoscopists (CI 95 % 0.94-0.97). A change in treatment for 34.3 % of the patients was implemented on seeing the results of the colonoscopy. Conclusions: There was an adequate, but not perfect, correlation between the different endoscopists for MES, UCEIS, UCCIS. This was higher with the last two scores. Thus, there is still some subjectivity to be minimized through special training, on assessing the seriousness of the endoscopic lesions in patients with UC.

Índice de Mayo Endoscópico e Índice de Severidad Endoscópica de la Colitis Ulcerosa: ¿son igual de válidos? / No disponible

INTRODUCCIÓN: la endoscopia tiene un papel fundamental en el manejo de los pacientes con colitis ulcerosa (CU), ya que permite la visualización y evaluación de la gravedad de la enfermedad. No obstante, dicha evaluación no es siempre algo objetivo, por lo que se han desarrollado diferentes escalas que pretenden homogeneizar los hallazgos. Objetico: el objetivo del estudio fue evaluar la variabilidad interobservador entre el Índice de Mayo Endoscópico (IME) y el Índice de Severidad Endoscópica de la Colitis Ulcerosa (UCEIS), al analizar la gravedad de las lesiones endoscópicas en pacientes con CU. El objetivo secundario fue analizar si la preparación catártica afectaba al grado de concordancia entre los endoscopistas. MATERIAL Y MÉTODOS: se trata de un estudio observacional comparativo de una única cohorte a la cual se realiza una colonoscopia bajo guía de práctica clínica habitual a pacientes con CU y se estadifica según el IME y el UCEIS por tres endoscopistas expertos. Para valorar el grado de correlación interobservador se utilizaron el índice de Kappa para el IME y el coeficiente de correlación intraclase para el UCEIS. Se incluyeron 67 pacientes, con edad media de 51 años (DE ± 16,7) e índice de Mayo clínico medio de 3,07 (DE ± 2,54). RESULTADOS: el índice de Kappa ponderado entre los endoscopistas A y B para el IME fue de 0,8; entre el A y el C, de 0,52; y entre el B y el C, de 0,49. Para el UCEIS, el coeficiente de correlación intraclase fue del 0,922 entre los tres endoscopistas (IC 95 %: 0,832-0,959). Se encontró una mejor correlación interobservador cuando la preparación catártica era ≥ 8 según la escala de Boston. CONCLUSIÓN: existe, por tanto, una superior correlación entre los diferentes endoscopistas para el UCEIS que para el IME, por lo que debería ser considerado como el mejor índice a utilizar en la práctica clínica. Una buena preparación catártica es importante para mejorar la correlación interobservador

No disponible

Index of the Mayo Endoscopy and Ulcerative Colitis Endoscopy Index of Severity: are they equally valid?

INTRODUCTION: endoscopy plays an essential role in the management of patients with ulcerative colitis (UC), as it allows us to visualize and assess the severity of the disease. Different scores have been devised to standardize the findings because such assessments are not always objective. AIMS: the aim of this study was to assess the interobserver variability between the Index of Mayo Endoscopy (IME) and the Ulcerative Colitis Endoscopy Index of Severity (UCEIS), analyzing the severity of the endoscopic lesions in patients with UC. The secondary aim was to analyze if the cathartic preparation affected the degree of concordance amongst the endoscopists. MATERIAL AND METHODS: this was a single-cohort observational, comparative study in which a colonoscopy was performed in patients with UC, as the normal clinical practice. The results were classified according to the IME and the UCEIS by three endoscopic specialists. In order to assess the degree of interobserver correlation, the Kappa index for IME was used and the intraclass correlation coefficient was used for UCEIS. RESULTS: sixty-seven patients were included in the study. The average age was 51 (SD ± 16.7) and the average Mayo Clinic index was 3.07 (SD ± 2.54). The weighted Kappa index between endoscopists A and B for the IME was 0.8, 0.52 between A and C and 0.49 between B and C. The intraclass correlation coefficient for UCEIS was 0.922 between the three endoscopists (95 % CI: 0.832-0.959). A better interobserver correlation was found when the cathartic preparation was ≥ 8 based on the Boston Scale. CONCLUSIONS: there was a higher correlation between the different endoscopists for the UCEIS than for the IME. Thus, this should be considered to be the best index to use in the clinical practice. A good cleansing preparation is important to improve the interobserver correlation.

Abdominal splenosis: a rare entity with a possible non-invasive diagnosis

No disponible

Abdominal splenosis: a rare entity with a possible non-invasive diagnosis.

Splenosis is an uncommon pathology whose diagnosis requires a high index of suspicion. In most cases they are incidental findings, so their suspicion is essential to carry out a non-invasive diagnosis. We present a case of intraabadominal splenosis and perform a brief review of the literature.

Hepatitis C y síndrome metabólico / Hepatitis C and metabolic syndrome

La resistencia a la insulina (RI) es un factor predictivo de respuesta al tratamiento con peginterferón y ribavirina en pacientes con hepatitis C. La RI provoca un deterioro en la sensibilidad al interferón y puede bloquear la su señalización intracelular. La RI induce la aparición de esteatosis, la progresión de la fibrosis y la liberación de citoquinas proinflamatorias al tiempo que disminuye la biodisponibilidad del interferón. Las sustancias supresoras de citoquinas 3 y las proteínas tirosín fosfatasas están implicadas en el bloqueo de la señalización intracelular del interferón y de la insulina. La RI se puede tratar mediante dieta, ejercicio físico o el uso de agentes sensibilizantes a la insulina como las biguanidas o las glitazonas. En el estudio TRIC-1 se ha demostrado que añadir metformina al tratamiento habitual mejora las posibilidades de curación en mujeres y en pacientes que consiguen normalizar la sensibilidad a la insulina durante el tratamiento (AU)

Insulin resistance is a predictive factor of response to treatment with peginterferon and ribavirin in patients with hepatitis C. Insulin resistance impairs sensitivity to interferon and can block its intracellular signalling. Insulin resistance also induces the development of steatosis, progression of fibrosis and proinflammatory cytokine release and reduces the bioavailability of interferon. Suppressor of cytokine signalling 3 and protein tyrosine phosphatases are involved in blocking the intracellular signalling of interferon and insulin. Insulin resistance can be treated through diet, physical exercise and the use of insulin-sensitizing agents such as biguanides or glitazones. The TRIC-1 study demonstrated that adding metformin to routine treatment improves the possibilities of cure in women and in patients whose insulin sensitivity returns to normal during treatment (AU)

[Hepatitis C and metabolic syndrome]. / Hepatitis C y síndrome metabólico.

Insulin resistance is a predictive factor of response to treatment with peginterferon and ribavirin in patients with hepatitis C. Insulin resistance impairs sensitivity to interferon and can block its intracellular signalling. Insulin resistance also induces the development of steatosis, progression of fibrosis and proinflammatory cytokine release and reduces the bioavailability of interferon. Suppressor of cytokine signalling 3 and protein tyrosine phosphatases are involved in blocking the intracellular signalling of interferon and insulin. Insulin resistance can be treated through diet, physical exercise and the use of insulin-sensitizing agents such as biguanides or glitazones. The TRIC-1 study demonstrated that adding metformin to routine treatment improves the possibilities of cure in women and in patients whose insulin sensitivity returns to normal during treatment.